Monday, September 2, 2013

Discussion

I just came back from a group discussion of various experts on the Syria situation.  This discussion above all else highlighted how chaotic the world of international relations is. The major facts on Syria I had, for the most part known, but the perspective where new and enlightening for me. For example, I thought the similarity's in the US military view, and Israeli view to be interesting. Both while acknowledging the moral, and political situation put little stock in ether. It was all about the red line. Syria has crossed over that red line and now US deterrence and defense is at risk in the form of credibility. It seems from this discussion that action must be and will be taken. The decision of president Obama to consult congress was also very interesting. It seems if congress agrees that it provides a safety blanket for decision makers, as well as showing the world a shining example of democracy in action. However if it dose not work I feel it risks undermining our government as action in Syria will likely happen ether way. In short I think asking congress is a good idea if congress agrees, but a bad idea if they don't because action is required to sustain our credibility. This discussion showed me how lawless the international community can be, and in a lawless community you are only as good as your word. Unfortunately this concept has put the US in a precarious position.

1 comment:

  1. You have hit on one of the most important elements in understanding international relations: anarchy. International politics differ from domestic politics of any country in that states interact in an anarchic system, meaning there are no enforceable laws. It is not anarchy in the sense of chaos--at least, not necessarily. But it is anarchy in the sense of an absence of hierarchy and government. Most challenges in international politics proceed from this fundamental condition.

    ReplyDelete